Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions.

Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions.

To what extend do you agree or disagree?

ANSWER:

Libraries are a peaceful place to study for students. Desktop technology is now replacing libraries functions, so preserving public libraries is a squander of wealth. I defy that to keep public libraries is a waste of cash even the computer technology is now supersede their functions, and behind this disagreement, my following reasons mentioned below.

Firstly, In this modern era, computer technology not only have libraries functions, but it also has other functions like game, video player, Music, etc. So while studying with a computer it can be diverted folk mind to use other functions, and they can't focus on study. Howbeit, libraries are the best area to study because in libraries can't change people brain to the other activity. For instance, pupils are studying on the computer after some time their mode swap to other activity like watching a movie, listening song, and so on.

Secondly, Libraries is a foremost part for study continuously 3-4 hours rather than a computer because peeps can't see constant 3-4 hours on a computer screen, its rays are perilous to the human eye, and perhaps a headache. Furthermore, everyone is not wealthy so all people can not buy a computer for them libraries is entails, and in libraries, people get some extra general knowledge. For example, when a people go to libraries they read the first newspaper, so they get daily news, and if anyone doesn't understand the topic and he/she can ask his/her friends to help.

To conclude, Computer Technology is now overriding the libraries function, but conserve public libraries is not a waste of money because to well-study for pupils libraries outweigh computer.